best wordpress themes

Need help? Write to us support@fillersfairy.com

Сall our consultants or Chat Online

+1(912)5047648

What are the contraindications for AMI eyes filler

Table of Contents

Contraindications include active skin infections, pregnancy, autoimmune disorders, and allergy to lidocaine/hyaluronic acid. Patients on blood thinners (e.g., aspirin) risk bruising (15–20% incidence).

Usage Restrictions Listed

Last week, a Manhattan luxury salon nearly faced catastrophe—a client applied AMI Filler around the eyes immediately after ultrasound therapy, resulting in subcutaneous nodules. Emergency physicians discovered a red warning box on page 2 of the manual stating: “72-hour post-energy device interval required.” This ICSC-045 certified product carries critical usage prohibitions:

  1. Absolute contraindications: Products containing over 15% AHAs, microcurrent devices, facial steamers. A March incident in Florida exemplifies this: Radiofrequency device activation with AMI caused hyperactivity of conductive agents, leading to mesh erythema requiring 42-day recovery.
  2. Complex temporal restrictions:
  • Morning application requires 15-minute film formation before sunscreen—zinc oxide in SPF50+ disrupts active peptide chains.
  • Night use mandates 2-hour separation from retinol products. One user developed severe flaking after combining AMI with 0.5% retinol.
Hazardous Combination Chart

Risk Action Consequence Solution
Use within 6 months of filler injections Accelerated HA metabolism Physician approval required
Lash extensions within 3 days Lash adhesive degradation Use magnetic lashes
Application with contacts Lens absorption of actives Remove lenses 20 minutes prior

Critical note: Post-opening shelf life is 90 days, not 6 months. Laboratory tests show AMI’s preservative efficacy drops 37% after 60 days. California case CA-215 developed blepharitis from expired product use.

What are the contraindications for AMI eyes filler

Who Should Avoid It

AMI’s customer service implemented AI screening due to rampant influencer-driven misuse. Discontinue immediately if:

■ ​Immunosuppressed patients (chemo/radiation therapy): Allergy risk escalates from 1% to 17%. Texas case TX-88 developed systemic urticaria during breast cancer treatment, requiring 3-day hospitalization.
■ ​Open periorbital wounds: Nano-HA penetrates even minor lesions. Clinical report IS-784 shows 5x increased capillary occlusion risk.
■ ​Active rosacea: Formula’s aescin aggravates telangiectasia. A client applied AMI to erythematous nasal areas, expanding inflammation by 30%.

Compared to competitors, AMI has fewer restrictions—La Mer prohibits eczema patients, while AMI only requires avoiding affected zones. ​Post-LASIK patients: Corneal nerve hypersensitivity may induce reflex tearing, washing away actives.

Expert ​3-second rebound test: Press lower eyelid skin. Delayed rebound (>2 seconds) indicates poor fluid circulation—perform 2-week cold compress pretreatment. Beverly Hills salons charge $250 for this assessment, replicable at home.

Medical Condition Precautions

AMI’s R&D Director Dr. Wu states: “No formula defeats genetic lottery.” Lab data reveals MC1R gene mutation carriers (common in redheads) have 4.8x higher pigmentation risk. Critical medical precautions:

▌ ​Autoimmune conditions:

  • Hashimoto’s: Halve dosage due to metabolic slowdown
  • Lupus: Avoid malar phototoxic zones
  • Atopic dermatitis: Apply only to intact skin ≤3x/week

▌ ​Metabolic disorders:

  • Diabetes: Monitor periorbital temperature—glycemic fluctuations impair microcirculation
  • Hyperthyroidism: Morning-only use prevents nocturnal metabolic hyperactivity
  • Renal insufficiency: Strict dosage control—drainage components strain kidneys

2024 ICSC report: Anticoagulant users (e.g., warfarin) experience 62% increased ecchymosis risk. Case NY-335 developed 3-week periorbital bruising post-cardiac stent.

SSRI users: Altered sebum composition causes accelerated absorption. Protocol: Alternate-day application avoiding nasolacrimal ducts. Milan clinics developed $180 “Neural Barrier Serum” for this cohort.

Allergy Risk Factors

An Upper East Side socialite triggered alarm after combining AMI with lash extensions, causing severe edema. Analysis of 217 allergy cases reveals hidden risks:

  1. Shellfish allergy: Patent US2024100HYA contains chitin-like structures. Shellfish-sensitive patients show 19% papule incidence within 48 hours—8x higher than La Mer Concentrate.
  2. Unexpected triggers:
  • Recent Botox-treated areas (accelerates neurotoxin diffusion)
  • β-glucan masks (induce adjuvant-like immune hyperactivation)
  • Contact lens solution residues (disrupt pH equilibrium)
Allergen Reaction Rate Onset
Nickel 7.3% 12-36hr
Pollinosis 4.1% Immediate
Active eczema 22%↑ ≤72hr
  1. Cross-reaction hazards: May 2024 case CA-112 combined AMI with dipotassium glycyrrhizate eye masks, inducing grade 3 dermatitis—ICSC-045 equates this risk to cephalosporin-alcohol interactions.

Pre-Treatment Warnings

A Beverly Hills clinic hemorrhage incident occurred when clients ignored ​**7-day retinol discontinuation** protocol. Essential protocols:

① ​Non-negotiable timelines:

  • 14-day post-aquagold/microneedling hiatus (300%+ penetration with open channels)
  • 72-hour pre-lash extension clearance (adhesive volatiles alter formula)
  • 24-hour alcohol abstinence (ethanol converts capillaries into toxin conduits)

② ​Device prohibitions:

  • RF devices (including home models—heat degrades crosslinked HA)
  • Facial steamers (thermal denaturation of syn-ake)
  • Phone heat exposure (induces abnormal polymer aggregation)

③ ​Mandatory preparations:

  1. 7-day acid product cessation (including PHAs)
  2. Current eye drop verification (preservative compatibility check)
  3. Medical-grade cold compresses (critical for vasodilation control)

Professional vs homecare critical differences:

Factor Professional Homecare
Storage 4°C cold chain Ambient
Delivery 0.2mm precision 37% absorption
Emergency Hyaluronidase on standby Cold water only

Prohibited Scenarios Guide

83% rejected clients at LA influencer salons violated these absolute bans:

■ ​Terminal contraindications:

  • Pregnancy/lactation (blood-ocular barrier penetration risks unverified)
  • Current isotretinoin use (including 3-month post-discontinuation)
  • Blepharospasm (botulinum-like components risk permanent paralysis)

■ ​**High-risk behaviors**: ① Post-procedure colored contacts (lens polymers sequester actives) ② Metallic massage tools (electrolytic toxin generation) ③ Luxury cream layering (La Mer’s algae polysaccharides crystallize)

■ ​Medical exclusions:

  • Sjögren’s syndrome (tear deficiency causes HA crystallization)
  • Thyroid eye disease (proptosis risks pressure necrosis)
  • Chronic rhinitis (abnormal lacrimal drainage)

Illegal injections by Brand X staff caused 0.3ml ocular vascular entry—emergency plasmapheresis required. Professional clinics justify $1500/session fees with $80,000 emergency crash carts.