SedyFill vs Maxy Fill: What Changes Beyond Pack Size?

Product snapshot checked August 10, 2026. Stock and prices can change. This guide compares current FillersFairy listings and visible product formats; it does not claim that one gel performs better in treatment.

SedyFill vs Maxy Fill: Current Range at a Glance

The first mistake in comparing these brands is to select one pack from each range and treat volume as the whole story. The more useful comparison looks at every currently listed SKU that changes the purchasing decision.

*Price snapshot from the current FillersFairy listings on August 10, 2026. Price per cc is a simple catalog calculation, not a measure of clinical value.

What the Two Standard Products Have in Common

SedyFill 60cc and Maxy Fill 70cc are closer than many comparison pages suggest. Both current listings identify cross-linked hyaluronic acid, both use 20mg per cc or mL in the current record, and both use HENM language. Both are also positioned as high-viscosity, cohesive body-filler gels.

That means it would be misleading to claim that standard Maxy Fill is automatically harder, or that standard SedyFill is automatically softer. Neither brand currently publishes enough directly comparable rheology data—such as G′, G″, complex viscosity, cohesivity score or extrusion force—to support a factual head-to-head texture ranking.

For the standard 60cc and 70cc products, the proven differences are the brand record, supplied volume, packaging identity, current price and price per cc. Texture becomes a clearer differentiator only when the Maxy Fill Hard 55cc SKU enters the comparison.

Where Texture Actually Becomes Different

SedyFill is described as a viscous, cohesive and mouldable gel. Its product positioning focuses on shape retention while remaining formable. However, the current SedyFill range is not divided into clearly labelled Hard and Soft versions. The visible range difference is led by size and packaging.

Maxy Fill has a different range architecture. The 70cc product is the standard high-volume record, while Maxy Fill Hard 55cc is explicitly labelled Hard. That name communicates a firmer-texture branch rather than another standard pack size. Quiver Medic also presents Maxy Fill as a family containing standard and Hard/Soft variants, although FillersFairy currently lists the 70cc and Hard 55cc records relevant to this comparison.

The SedyFill Range: Capacity and Packaging First

The current SedyFill range gives buyers three capacity steps. The 60cc carton is the lowest-priced entry at $72.50. The 80cc product currently has the lowest catalog price per supplied cc at approximately $1.07 and its real product photograph shows a 24mg/cc label. The 100cc listing offers the largest single supplied volume, but it also changes to a flexible-bag presentation.

These are meaningful product differences. A larger pack may reduce the number of individual units on an order, while a different container format changes how the item is identified, received and stored. The 100cc bag should therefore have its own inventory image and receiving checklist; it should not inherit the glass-vial description from the 80cc SKU.

Concentration also needs SKU-level attention. The current 60cc photograph shows 20mg/cc, while the current 80cc carton and vial show 24mg/cc. Buyers should read the physical label for the supplied SKU instead of assuming that every SedyFill size contains the same concentration.

The Maxy Fill Range: Standard Format and a Hard Branch

Maxy Fill 70cc is the straightforward standard-volume option in the current catalog. Its $88.90 price produces a current catalog cost of about $1.27 per supplied cc. Its role is easy to understand when a buyer already uses the standard Maxy Fill record and wants the 70cc vial format.

Maxy Fill Hard 55cc is not the cheaper small pack. At $125, it has the highest current price per supplied cc in this five-SKU comparison. Its commercial reason for existing is therefore not economy of volume; it is the named Hard texture branch and a different product record.

This is exactly why price per cc must be paired with product identity. If the request is simply for standard high-volume HA, the Hard 55cc premium should not be treated as automatically better value. If the request specifically names the Hard record, comparing it only with larger standard packs would ignore the requested texture category.

Which Current SKU Fits the Procurement Need?

What Buyers Still Need to Confirm

Online product copy is useful for shortlisting, but the supplied label remains the final product-level checkpoint. Confirm the exact name, concentration, volume, container type, lot and expiry against the physical unit. This is especially important when a range changes concentration or presentation between sizes.

One short market boundary is also necessary: a Korean product listing does not by itself establish authorisation for every destination or intended use. That question should be checked separately and should not dominate the product comparison.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SedyFill softer than Maxy Fill?

That cannot be confirmed from current comparable data. Standard SedyFill and Maxy Fill are both described as high-viscosity, cohesive HA gels. Maxy Fill Hard 55cc is the clearly labelled firmer branch, but no reliable head-to-head rheology data quantifies the difference from SedyFill.

What is the main difference between SedyFill and Maxy Fill?

SedyFill currently operates mainly as a 60cc, 80cc and 100cc capacity range with changes in concentration labels and packaging. Maxy Fill currently combines a standard 70cc vial with a separate Hard 55cc texture branch.

Which current product has the lowest price per cc?

In the August 10, 2026 FillersFairy price snapshot, SedyFill 80cc is approximately $1.07 per supplied cc, the lowest of the five compared SKUs. Prices can change.

Are all SedyFill sizes the same concentration?

No assumption should be made across the range. The current 60cc product photograph shows 20mg/cc, while the current 80cc carton and vial show 24mg/cc. Confirm the physical label for every ordered SKU.

Why does Maxy Fill Hard 55cc cost more per cc?

The current listing positions it as a distinct Hard texture product rather than a volume-value pack. Its higher unit cost should be evaluated against a request for that specific product record, not interpreted as proof of better results.

Is the SedyFill 100cc package the same type as the smaller sizes?

No. The current product photograph shows a flexible-bag presentation for the 100cc SKU, while the 80cc image shows a glass vial. The receiving record should preserve that packaging difference.

Bottom Line

SedyFill and Maxy Fill are not meaningfully compared by saying “60cc versus 70cc.” SedyFill offers a capacity-led range whose concentration labels and packaging change between SKUs. Maxy Fill adds an explicit texture branch through Hard 55cc alongside its standard 70cc vial. The best commercial comparison starts with the exact requirement—entry price, unit cost, largest pack, standard Maxy continuity or a specifically named Hard texture—then verifies the physical label before purchase.